Answers
Nov 07, 2007 - 03:28 AM
John,
Well, the parent container - in your case, the tag has a built-in measure called Cellspacing which renders a pixel void between all cells in the table.
If you're looking to just add a bit more "whitespace" to an individual cell, you can look at increasing the padding of that cell, but it may have undesirable effects on the adjoining cells.
I hope this helps,
Ric
Well, the parent container - in your case, the tag has a built-in measure called Cellspacing which renders a pixel void between all cells in the table.
If you're looking to just add a bit more "whitespace" to an individual cell, you can look at increasing the padding of that cell, but it may have undesirable effects on the adjoining cells.
I hope this helps,
Ric
Nov 08, 2007 - 02:50 AM
Hey Ric,
I was hoping that I would just be able to effect the spacing between cells, not the padding.
Is there any way to accomplish that with CSS?
I was hoping that I would just be able to effect the spacing between cells, not the padding.
Is there any way to accomplish that with CSS?
Nov 27, 2007 - 12:01 PM
John,
Sadly, the Cellspacing property of the affects the void on all sides of the cell. If you're looking for left and right-side padding, you can do it with CSS by creating a class and using that class on the desired cells.
Here's the rub...anything you do that effects the width of one cell, effects the width of all cells above and below it.
You may want to look at using a pure CSS solution...if you want to post a code sample, maybe I can help you brew something up.
Take care,
ric
Sadly, the Cellspacing property of the affects the void on all sides of the cell. If you're looking for left and right-side padding, you can do it with CSS by creating a class and using that class on the desired cells.
Here's the rub...anything you do that effects the width of one cell, effects the width of all cells above and below it.
You may want to look at using a pure CSS solution...if you want to post a code sample, maybe I can help you brew something up.
Take care,
ric
Oct 16, 2010 - 04:57 PM
I see that this question is closed and points have been rewarded and that's fine. I don't know about your point system and don't want any points.
However, as I read this, the original question was how to set cell spacing in CSS. The response that "you can do that in your table" was unresponsive to the question. The question was NOT "what are my options for applying cell spacing?" The person asked SPECIFICALLY for how to add cell spacing through CSS. After the pointless discussion, Ric simply deducted that in order to keep the cell spacing from impacting all cells around the specific cell desired, that "You may want to look at using a pure CSS solution."
Well, DUH. That is what the original question WAS. The original person posting the question specifically asked for the CSS solution.
So, how do you determine this question to be closed when the question asked was never even addressed, but the people who responded addressed the question they apparently THOUGHT should have been asked?
And, how do you "award points," which is clearly some kind of reward, to someone who did not provide an answer, but merely confirmed that the person posting the question should look for the answer...IN THE EXACT METHOD he/she was asking about?
This is how you people think questions should be asked and answered? What, then, is your purpose?
However, as I read this, the original question was how to set cell spacing in CSS. The response that "you can do that in your table" was unresponsive to the question. The question was NOT "what are my options for applying cell spacing?" The person asked SPECIFICALLY for how to add cell spacing through CSS. After the pointless discussion, Ric simply deducted that in order to keep the cell spacing from impacting all cells around the specific cell desired, that "You may want to look at using a pure CSS solution."
Well, DUH. That is what the original question WAS. The original person posting the question specifically asked for the CSS solution.
So, how do you determine this question to be closed when the question asked was never even addressed, but the people who responded addressed the question they apparently THOUGHT should have been asked?
And, how do you "award points," which is clearly some kind of reward, to someone who did not provide an answer, but merely confirmed that the person posting the question should look for the answer...IN THE EXACT METHOD he/she was asking about?
This is how you people think questions should be asked and answered? What, then, is your purpose?
Add New Comment